Redevelopment agencies must follow substantive and procedural rules when exercising eminent domain authority.
Davis County v. Zions First National Bank
Requirements for eminent domain complaint; determining value.
Three D Corp. v. Salt Lake City
Substantial and material impairment of a property owner’s right of access can constitute a compensable taking.
UDOT v. Harvey Real Estate
Access rights do not include rights to existing traffic flow or guaranteed access at a specific location.
Provo City v. Ivie
Cities may only exercise authority granted to them by the Legislature.
Selman v. Box Elder County
Discusses the authority of the Ombudsman’s Office to mediate takings disputes.
Marion Energy, Inc. v. KFJ Ranch Partnership
Ambiguity in eminent domain statute construed in favor of property owner.
Schroeder Investments, LC v. UDOT
Discusses the “more necessary public use” rule pertaining to eminent domain.
Davis County v. Clearfield City
Denial of Conditional Use Permit is arbitrary when it is not supported by substantial evidence.
