There must be an essential link, or “nexus” between an exaction and a legitimate government interest.
Dolan v. City of Tigard
Establishes “rough proportionality” test for exactions.
Koontz v. St Johns River Water Management District
Exaction analysis applies whether government imposes conditions on approval or denies an permit, and includes money exactions for offsite mitigation.
Call v. City of West Jordan
Exactions must be reasonably attributable to development activity.
Banberry Development Corp. v. City of South Jordan
Reasonableness of Impact Fees.
Salt Lake County v. Granite Board of Education
School districts may be charged impact fees.
Home Builders Association v. American Fork
Validity of impact fees.
B.A.M. Development, LLC v. Salt Lake County (“BAM I”)
Applying the rough proportionality test to exactions.
Home Builders Association v. City of North Logan
Impact fees must not require newly-developed properties to bear more than an equitable share of capital costs for facilities.
- Page 1 of 2
- 1
- 2
