Utah Court of Appeals 2009UT App 291, 221 P.3d 280Claims not raised before a trial court may not be raised before an appellate court. A court’s review of a local government’s land use decision is specifically limited to the record provided by the local government. A reviewing court may not accept or consider any evidence outside of the record. A court’s …
Davis County v. Clearfield City
Denial of Conditional Use Permit is arbitrary when it is not supported by substantial evidence.
Patterson v. American Fork
Administrative remedies must be exhausted before a land use decision may be challenged in court.
Bradley v. Payson City
Standards of review for legislative and administrative decisions.
Fox v. Park City
Appellate review of land use decisions, what makes a decision arbitrary, capricious, or illegal.
Cedar Mountain Environmental, Inc. v. Tooele County
Standing requirements under LUDMA are the same as traditional and alternative standing tests.
City of Grantsville v. Tooele City
Establishing standing, or the right to pursue a claim in court.
Salt Lake City Mission v. Salt Lake City
Administrative remedies must be exhausted before a land use decision may be challenged in court.
Krejci v. Saratoga Springs
Zoning ordinances may be subject to initiative and referenda.
