Land uses may be regulated to promote public welfare.
Uintah Mountain RTC, LLC v. Duchesne County
Decision to grant or deny a conditional use application must be based upon substantial evidence; consent of neighbors may not be a requirement for a conditional use permit.
Tooele Associates, LP v. Tooele City
Validity of inspection fees.
Smith Investment Company v. Sandy City
Validity of zoning ordinances.
Hatch v. Boulder Town
Authority to enact zoning ordinances.
Alta v. Ben Hame Corp.
Mistakenly-issued approvals do not bind a local zoning authority.
Berman v. Parker
Land use may be regulated for aesthetic purposes.
Davis County v. Clearfield City
Denial of conditional use permit must be based on concrete, factual evidence.
Morrison v. Horne
Mistaken characterization does not establish zoning estoppel.
